One of the most prevalent theories is that of Todorov. He suggests that every narrative has a simple structure of equilibrium, disequilibrium and then return to a state of equilibrium. This is a simplified version of a five step theory.
1. Equilibrium
2. Disruption of order
3. Recognition of disruption or a disequilibrium
4. Attempt to repair the disequilibrium
5. New equilibrium
Heres a visual representation:

However, not all narratives fall within this theory. For example, John Carpenter’s film ‘Halloween’ ends with the films villain, ‘Michal Myers’ escaping and therefore the film has no new equilibrium. This is the same with a lot of horror films, because it not only creates a sense of hopelessness but also set the film up for a sequel. This feeling of no real new equilibrium is also prevalent in our film. At the end Edgar is left with his reality smashed to pieces. We left it like this to show the harshness of schizophrenia.
Another Theory is that of Propp. Propp was a Russian critic, active in the 1920’s and he noticed Folk tales were similar in many areas. They were about the same basic struggles and they appeared to have stock characters. He identified a theory about characters and actions as narrative functions.
These characters were:
• The Hero – a character that seeks something
• The Villain – who opposes or actively blocks the hero’s quest
• The Donor – who provides an object with magical properties
• The Dispatcher – who sends the hero on his/her quest via a message
• The False Hero – who disrupts the hero’s success by making false claims
• The Helper – who aids the hero
• The Princess – acts as the reward for the hero and the object of the villain’s plots
• Her Father – who acts to reward the hero for his effort
Once again this theory can be applied to most narratives, however in a modern culture has been disproven by certain films. This theory, however, is more relevant to ‘Living with Ronnie’ in that all our characters fit into one of the above, with Edgar as the hero, seeking the truth of reality, Ronnie the villain, obscuring his way, and Edgar’s mother the Donor, holding the truth.
Having known about the theory’s from previous lessons in film studies and mentions in AS media they were in the back of my head when my partner and I where shaping our film. We consciously made the decision to not restore equilibrium at the end of the film. However Propp’s theory seemed less relevant, and the characters seemed to fall into the above categories, therefore making the theory more present in modern films.


